Upload your resume and see how well it passes applicant tracking systems. Get a compatibility score and specific fixes for ATS issues — free, no signup.
PDF or Word document, up to 5 MB
We're reviewing your resume and building your score.
Turquoise rewrites your resume to address every issue above — tailored to a specific job. First one's free.
Tailor my resumeAn ATS score checker tells you whether your resume can survive automated filtering before a human ever reads it. An applicant tracking system — ATS for short — is the software that companies use to collect, organize, and screen job applications. When you submit your resume through a company's careers page, it does not go straight to a recruiter. It first passes through the ATS, which parses your document into structured data, extracts key information, and checks it against the job requirements. If your resume fails this step, no human will ever see it.
Studies consistently estimate that up to 75% of resumes are filtered out by ATS before reaching a recruiter. Some are rejected for lacking relevant keywords. But a surprising number are filtered simply because the ATS could not parse the resume correctly — the formatting broke the parser, and your experience was lost in translation.
Our ATS score checker evaluates your resume against the parsing standards used by the most widely deployed applicant tracking systems. It checks whether your document structure, section headers, and formatting are compatible with automated parsing. The major ATS platforms — Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, iCIMS, Taleo, and BambooHR — all use similar parsing logic, though each has its own quirks. Greenhouse and Lever tend to handle modern PDF formatting reasonably well. Workday and Taleo are notoriously strict and struggle with anything beyond simple, single-column layouts.
Most ATS parsing failures come from a handful of formatting mistakes that are easy to fix once you know what to look for. Here are the most common issues our ATS score checker detects:
An ATS readability score of 80 or above means your resume is well-structured for automated parsing. The ATS can identify your sections, extract your contact information, and read your bullet points without errors. Scores between 60 and 79 indicate fixable issues — maybe a non-standard section header or minor formatting inconsistency. Below 60 means your resume has significant ATS compatibility problems that are likely costing you interviews.
If you want to automatically fix every ATS issue our checker finds and tailor your resume to a specific job, try Turquoise for free.
An ATS (applicant tracking system) is software that companies use to collect, sort, and filter job applications. Before a human recruiter sees your resume, the ATS parses it into structured data and checks it against the job requirements. Major ATS platforms include Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, iCIMS, and Taleo.
An ATS readability score of 80 or above means your resume is well-structured for automated parsing. Scores between 60 and 79 are acceptable but have fixable issues. Below 60 means your resume likely has formatting problems that could cause it to be misparsed or filtered out.
The most common ATS failures are tables, multi-column layouts, text boxes, embedded images, non-standard section headers, headers and footers containing important information, and non-standard fonts. These elements confuse ATS parsers and can cause your content to be lost or scrambled.
Yes. Studies estimate that up to 75% of resumes are filtered out by ATS before a human sees them. Some are filtered for lack of keyword matches, but many are filtered simply because the ATS could not parse the resume correctly due to formatting issues.
Our checker evaluates your resume against the parsing standards used by the most common ATS platforms: Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, iCIMS, Taleo, and BambooHR. The feedback applies broadly because ATS parsing issues are usually consistent across systems.